12/6/2023 0 Comments Y committed synopsisCertain links may direct you away from Bank of America to an unaffiliated site. ![]() Bank of America does not assume liability for any loss or damage resulting from anyone's reliance on the information provided. These materials are for informational purposes only. Opinions or ideas expressed are not necessarily those of Bank of America nor do they reflect their views or endorsement. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue.Ĭontent contained herein may have been produced by an outside party that is not affiliated with Bank of America or any of its affiliates (Bank of America). Before acting on any information in this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. ![]() This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security, financial instrument, or strategy. In its Order, the court found "that Synopsys is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim" that URI violated Section 1201 of the DMCA "by circumventing Synopsys’ technological measures to gain unauthorized access to Synopsys copyright protected software." The court also ordered that discovery examining the computers will be subject to a forensic agreement between the parties and will be conducted by a neutral, third-party consultant.Investing in securities involves risks, and there is always the potential of losing money when you invest in securities. On February 4, 2021, the court responded to the filings and associated oral arguments with an Order granting the requests for a temporary restraining order and expedited discovery. These arguments emphasize (1) Synopsys's allegedly "dilatory" response to the alleged piracy (according to URI, the Company's security software first notified it of potential counterfeit license key use in November of 2020) (2) the "immediate actions" URI has taken to preserve evidence and prevent further misconduct and (3) concerns about giving Synopsys unfettered access to the computers at issue, since they also likely contain private and proprietary information unrelated to this case. URI filed a Response in opposition to the motion, arguing against each of its three requests. ![]() In addition to the relief and damages requested in its Complaint, Synopsys filed a Motion requesting (1) a temporary restraining order keeping URI from using its products without permission (2) an order requiring URI to show why a preliminary injunction should not issue and (3) an order to allow expedited discovery in connection with the URI computers through which the unlicensed uses occurred. According to the Complaint, because Synopsys's software is copyrighted material and is protected by anticircumvention measures, use of the counterfeit license keys constitutes piracy and violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Synopsys alleges that more than 135,000 uses of counterfeit license keys occurred on at least two workstations connected to URI's network. The Complaint alleges that parties at URI, which licenses EDA software from Synopsys, has been using counterfeit license key files to access the Synopsys software instead of using the proper method.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |